PROTEGGA LLC Breach Of Contract

NOTE: PROTEGGA LLC respects the privacy of all parties involved in each of its cases and; therefore, will not disclose cause numbers, company or individual credentials, or other items that may lead to identification.

Scenario

Type of Case: Civil Litigation
County: Collin
Plaintiff: Security Company – “ABC”
Defendant: Security Monitoring Company – “XYZ”

Description: ABC is a contracted reseller of security monitoring services provided by XYZ. XYZ hires VP of Sales employed by ABC in violation of the reseller agreement.

Summary

Timeline
Contract execution date: June 2, 2004
Date VP of Sales terminated employment with ABC: January 17, 2005
Date VP of Sales hired by XYZ: January 26, 2005

Section of Contract Violated
“The parties agree that during the Term of this Agreement and for a period of one (1) year after its expiration or termination, they shall not, without the prior written consent of the other party, hire, or directly or indirectly solicit the full-time or part-time employment of any officer, director, employee, agent, contractor or consultant of such other party.”

Defendants’ Response
VP of Sales was hired after he quit ABC Company; therefore, there was no violation of the contract.

Computer Forensic Evidence Recovered
The laptop belonging to ABC Company, and in use by the VP of Sales, was the only computer investigated. All data was removed from the system, including emails, temporary internet files, cookies, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. The recycle bin was emptied and the Windows defrag utility was executed. ABC Company utilized Outlook 2003 for corporate mail.

Following is a small example of the data recovered from the laptop showing the use of a private yahoo.com email account.

Conclusion

The “he wasn’t an ABC Company employee anymore” defense did not hold up with the computer forensic evidence at hand. It was clear that the VP of Sales was solicited, either directly or indirectly, prior to his termination of employment with ABC Company. The computer forensic evidence was substantial enough, on this and other charges, to warrant a civil suit and to justify a Temporary Restraining Order. Wisely, the defendants determined further litigation and the e-discovery process would prove too damaging and settled within 3 months.

For more information about PROTEGGA LLC or this case study, feel free to contact us:
Ask The Pman
214.988.9240
[back]